LR: Labour Party Presidential Candidate, Peter Obi and his running mate, Yusuf Datti-Ahmed.
Justice Daniel Osiagor fixed the date after taking arguments from the parties on the mode of service of court processes, among others.
In the suit, 10 plaintiffs, including nine lawyers, are asking the court to, among others, restrain the LP, its presidential candidate Peter Obi, his vice Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed, one Julius Abure and their loyalists from holding the rally, until the hearing and determination of their Motion-On-Notice of September 12, 2022.
The plaintiffs are Adedotun Ajulo Esq., Salamatu Suleiman Lewi Esq., Hakeem Ijaduola, Esq., Ogunbona Akinpelu Esq., Owolabi K. Oluwasegun, Esq., Mogbojuri Kayode Esq., Wuyep Mantim Nadom Esq., Dimimu Mabel, Esq., Kolawole Salami, Esq. and Mr Wale Abe Lawrence.
The 1st to 10th defendants in the suit marked FHC/L/CS/1729/2022 are Obi, LP, Baba-Ahmed, Abure, the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Commissioner of Police (Lagos State Command), Director-General (Department of State Services), Lekki Concession Company (LCC) Limited, Attorney-General of Lagos State and The Governor of Lagos State.
When the matter first came up on September 15, Justice Osiagor directed the plaintiffs to put all the defendants on notice and adjourned the hearing of the substantive motion till Friday, September 23, 2022.
At the commencement of proceedings on Friday, Messrs. Romeo Ese-Michael with Kayode Mogbojuri appeared for the Plaintiffs.
The 1st to 4th Respondents were represented by a team led by Daniel Ibeagu whilst the 8th, 9th and 10th Defendants were represented by Jonathan Ogunsanya.
Counsel to the 1st and 3rd Defendants objected to the mode of service but Justice Osiagor ordered they should be served in court.
The judge admonished parties to abridge time as the matter is of importance, noting that the motion on the notice must be heard and determined before October 1.
He further urged parties to avoid technicalities meant to frustrate such a sensitive matter and adjourned till September 28 for a hearing of the motion for an injunction.
The plaintiffs in the suit marked FHC/L/CS/1729/2022, filed an ex parte motion through their counsel Mr Dada Awosika, SAN, leading Temilolu Adamolekun and others.
They argued that a repeat or celebration of the "infamous" EndSARS protest of 2020 under the political guise of "#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally" will cause a breakdown of peace and will result in post-traumatic stress disorder for them and the public.
They prayed to the court for four reliefs.
"An order of interim injunction restraining the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants; their associates and loyalists from conducting the scheduled END SARS Rally tagged as the "#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally on the 1st of October, 2020 or any other subsequent date, at the Lekki Toll Gate until the hearing and determination of the Motion-On-Notice dated September 12, 2022.
"An order of interim injunction restraining the 1st 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants and their loyalists from further planning and promoting the Scheduled END SARS Rally tagged as the "#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally"...
"An order of interim injunction restraining the 5th 6th, 7th Defendants from allowing or granting permissions to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants, their agents and the organizers of "#Obidatti23 Forward Ever Rally" at the behest of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants from carrying out the said anniversary on the 1st of October, 2022 and any other subsequent date...
"An order of interim injunction restraining the 8th Defendant (LCC) from granting permission to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants; their agents, privies, allies and loyalists, to make use of the Lekki Toll Gate or any space under and within the control of the 8th Defendant for carrying out the said anniversary on the 1st of October, 2022 and any other subsequent date..."
